Some of these cookies are necessary to make the site work. We’d also like to use optional cookies to help improve your experience on the site. You can manage your optional cookie preferences below. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences. Your preferences can be changed at any time.
For further details, see our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy
Essential cookies enable core functionality such as page navigation and access to secure areas. The website cannot function properly without these cookies; they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences. Third party functions such as Google Search and Analytics will not be enabled.
Performance settings enable you to use the Google Search engine on our website and help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage (for example, which of our pages are most frequently visited).
Number of representations on Evidence Base: 2
Objection: 0
Support: 0
Comment: 2
Three is no review policy within the plan and this should be a consideration of the Council. It is the intention of the Housing White Paper for plans to be reviewed every five years and Gladman therefore suggest that the plan would benefit from a policy within the Plan that would introduce a commitment to review in line with this. (Gladman Developments Ltd).
Public Health welcome the proposal to expand the number of indicators being monitored and would suggest that you incorporate some health and wellbeing indicators in order to monitor progress towards strategic policy 7. The Public Health Outcomes Framework www.phoutcomes.info provides a good source of data on a range of validated indicators and we would be happy to work with you on which indicators would be appropriate to include. (Hampshire County Council – Public Health).
Back to Top
How to get here
