Cookies and Privacy

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer

Some of these cookies are necessary to make the site work. We’d also like to use optional cookies to help improve your experience on the site. You can manage your optional cookie preferences below. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences. Your preferences can be changed at any time.

For further details, see our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy

I Accept I Do Not Accept

Essential

Essential cookies enable core functionality such as page navigation and access to secure areas. The website cannot function properly without these cookies; they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences. Third party functions such as Google Search and Analytics will not be enabled.

Performance

Opt-in to performance settings

Performance settings enable you to use the Google Search engine on our website and help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage (for example, which of our pages are most frequently visited).

Save and Close

Press Release

10 July 2025

Local Voices Matter – A Better Way to Reorganise Local Government

Joint statement by Eastleigh Borough Council, Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, Fareham Borough Council, Hart District Council, Havant Borough Council, Isle of Wight Council, New Forest District Council, Portsmouth City Council, Rushmoor Borough Council, Southampton City Council, Test Valley Borough Council and Winchester City Council.

Hampshire County Council has published its case for a future of only three, large-scale, councils across the county.

Their proposal risks creating remote, oversized councils, cut off from the places and people they serve. Our communities deserve better.

Here’s what the 12 councils working together across Hampshire, Southampton, Portsmouth and the Isle of Wight believe:

Local people should shape local decisions.
Making councils bigger makes it harder for residents to influence decisions that affect their daily lives, like school places, adult social care, housing and transport.
Biggest doesn’t mean best
Services like social care and special educational needs are already under pressure. Proposing three large councils won’t fix that. The evidence shows that larger public authorities don’t guarantee better services, and they often feel more distant and harder to access for local people.
There’s a better way.
The councils working together across Hampshire and the Solent are putting forward proposals for five unitary authorities (four on the mainland and one; the Isle of Wight) that are:
- Large enough to succeed, with the capacity to deliver joined-up services and value for money.
- Small enough to care, rooted in real places and responsive to the communities they serve.

Smaller councils already prove this can work. They deliver high-performing services like waste collection, housing, and local regeneration. They respond quickly to local needs, support diverse communities, and work closely with local businesses, schools and voluntary groups. This isn’t theory, it’s how we work every day.

We already work together at scale when it makes sense; like through Project Integra, our long-standing waste partnership across Hampshire. We collaborate to save money and improve services, without losing the local accountability and flexibility our communities value.

Local identity should count.
Real communities are shaped around sense of place and how people actually live, where they travel, learn, work and access services. This is why we are asking people to tell us about these things and share their views on our three options.

Crucially, Hampshire County Council’s own research shows people feel most connected to their immediate neighbourhoods, not large remote councils, and that many fear LGR will reduce their sense of local identity, weaken local representation, and make services harder to access. For the services people rely on every day, like roads and travel, local understanding matters. A single, county-wide approach can’t reflect the needs of such a diverse area. Our proposed model allows services to be designed and delivered around real communities, not a one-size-fits-all system.

Local democracy needs more than ‘token localism’
HCC’s plan for district area panels and locality teams within super-sized councils isn’t enough risks creating powerless talking shops. Communities need genuine decision-making power at neighbourhood level, with frontline councillors supported to lead and shape local priorities.

We are committed to creating councils that are simpler, stronger and more local, not just bigger. And we will continue working together to build a future that reflects the people and places of Hampshire and the Solent.

Cllr Martin, Leader of Fareham Borough Council, said: “I believe that localism is a crucial factor in any proposed change, helping to create a sense of home and belonging within the new council areas. This isn’t just about numbers, it is about places that naturally fit together by sharing similar geography and values. The Government has been clear that each Council is expected to support a case that works for the whole of the Hampshire and Solent area and should not form a view simply on their own borough or district. So, while the proposed south-east cluster is reasonable, the same cannot be said for the north which ranges from Basingstoke to Rowlands Castle, or the south-west with areas as disparate as New Milton, Southampton and Andover."

ENDS