skip to main content

Accessibility and Display Options

Choose accessibility and display settings
Text Preferences
Colour Schemes
Save Close

Cookies and Privacy

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer

Some of these cookies are necessary to make the site work. We’d also like to use optional cookies to help improve your experience on the site. You can manage your optional cookie preferences below. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences. Your preferences can be changed at any time.

For further details, see our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy

I AcceptI Do Not Accept


Essential cookies enable core functionality such as page navigation and access to secure areas. The website cannot function properly without these cookies; they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences. Third party functions such as Google Search and Analytics will not be enabled.


Performance settings enable you to use the Google Search engine on our website and help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage (for example, which of our pages are most frequently visited).

Save and Close


You are here: Home / Planning / Local Plan / Responses

EV13 - Background Paper: Housing Site Selection Background Paper


Housing Site Selection Paragraph 1.3 states that ‘This paper is intended to increase transparency in how complex evidence base documents and planning considerations have been used in establishing the preferred approach to housing site allocation. It is not intended to provide a detailed overview or assessment of individual sites.’ However, the ‘broad site summaries’ do not include sufficient information to make the choices made transparent. It is not clear how the Site Selection Priorities/Refining Points; have been used. In many cases the summaries for sites that have been selected are almost identical to those that have not been selected. It would help if a table for each site showing how the ‘score’ against each priority/point is included. There is a particular difficulty with point 7 relating to highway impacts because there is no reference to the Interim Transport Assessment in the list of evidence, however many of the assessments refer to ‘minimal highway works required’ or other highway issues. How has point 7 been used and what evidence lies behind the comments? In some cases, point 10 ‘to provide and maintain a defensible urban edge following development’ does not appear to have been used. In relation to Site HA10 Funtley Road South, the ‘view corridors’ are totally inadequate to maintain views that properly recognise the site’s landscape context. In relation to Site HA8, Pinks Hill, what is the evidence for saying that ‘noise and other associated amenity issues due to A27/M27 can be mitigated? The Society is uncomfortable with allocating sites for housing that are excessively noisy or have their primary access through an industrial estate or narrow residential roads.


Back to top of page Back to Top How to get here
Fareham Borough Council, Civic Offices, Civic Way, Hampshire, PO16 7AZ
Tel: +44 (0) 1329 236100 | Mobile Text/Photo: 07860 098627
RSS Feeds