Appendices Summary of Comments
Representations on Appendix C: HA1 Framework
Number of representations on policy: 1
Objection: 0
Support: 0
Comment: 1
Comment
Final paragraph refers to a pedestrian link to Victory Hall but this is not wanted by the halls Management Committee. These references should therefore by removed. (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes).
The dwelling mix shown in Table A1 should not be seen as a definitive mix and this should be made clear in the text introducing the table. (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes)
The appendix includes terminology such as 'the development must….' in relation to densities. This wording should be changed to allow for greater flexibility. (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes)
The key to the diagram omits the dashed yellow line so it is not clear what this is illustrating. (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes)
There is no justification for the 'habitat to be protected/incorporated/enhanced' at the east portion of the Bargate Homes Part of the site. (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes)
Needs to allow more flexibility for connections over the open space as there is no objection to this approach from statutory consultees (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes).
The extent of public open space and habitat corridor at the centre of the Bargate site is excessive and there is no ecological justification for such a large area. (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes)
Representations on Appendix D: HA2 Framework
Number of representations on policy: 1
Objection: 0
Support: 0
Comment: 1
Comment
The dwelling mix shown in Table A1 should not be seen as a definitive mix and will be informed by a wide range of factors including viability and market conditions and this should be made clear in the text introducing the table. (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes)
Needs clarification that the Development Framework is the Council's
preferred approach, but not the only approach. (WYG on behalf of Bargate Homes)