skip to main content

Accessibility and Display Options

Choose accessibility and display settings
Text Preferences
Colour Schemes
Save Close

Cookie preferences

We and our partners use technologies such as cookies on our site to enhance your user experience, personalise content and analyse our traffic.

Accept the recommended settings to consent to the use of this technology on our site.

To change your consent choices at any time please use the toggles below.

For further details, see our Cookie Policy

Accept recommended settings

Essential cookies

Essential cookies enable core functionality such as page navigation and access to secure areas. The website cannot function properly without these cookies; they can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.

Performance cookies

Performance cookies help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage (for example, which of our pages are most frequently visited).

Save and Close


You are here: Home / Planning / Local Plan / Responses

Introduction Summary Comments

Representations on the Introduction Chapter

Number of representations on policy: 10

Objection: 1

Support: 2

Comment: 7


The plan is not accessible with 1,000s of pages of evidence and inaccurate data included (such as 7,000 residents in Portchester and that the plan does not reflect 19,000 being registered with doctors but only 14,000 on electoral roll).


Welcome and support the identification of heritage assets in paragraph 1.39. (Historic England).

Paragraphs 1.21 to 1.25 are supported and the Council should not support building on the draft sites until the Plan has been fully adopted.


The Council should consider including data on health and wellbeing to set the context. (Hampshire County Council).

Hampshire County Council as the Minerals and Waste Planning Authority are pleased to see that the draft Local Plan and appendices reference the adopted Hampshire Minerals and Waste plan (2013). However this seems to be only briefly mentioned in the glossary of terms and the County Council consider that this adopted planning policy needs to be adequately referenced in the draft Local Plan (Hampshire County Council – Strategic Planning).

The 'ideals' articulated in the document need to be enforced in reality.

The PUSH housing need figures should be carefully considered in the light of BREXIT.

Paragraph 1.38 mentions the presence of the 3 main rivers in the Borough. However, the Plan does not seem to highlight that they pose a potential flood risk. It would be useful if the Plan acknowledged this. In addition, there is little recognition throughout the Plan regarding the water environment in general. The importance of the 3 rivers in the Borough should be better recognised in the Plan not only in relation to the environment but also potential public amenity and health and wellbeing benefits. (Environment Agency).

Within Paragraph 1.38 it is considered that the national and international designations applying to the coastal and estuarine areas should be highlighted by the reference of their inclusion as part of the Natura 2000 suite of sites SPA, SAC, Ramsar. Whilst highlighting some of the features of ecological importance this paragraph only highlights designations of national importance. (Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust).

Back to top of page Back to Top How to get here
Fareham Borough Council, Civic Offices, Civic Way, Hampshire, PO16 7AZ
Tel: +44 (0) 1329 236100 | Mobile Text/Photo: 07876 131415
RSS Feeds